Tuesday, January 21, 2020
Knowledge Of Information :: essays research papers
 Knowledge of Information      DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE:    Ralph is a recent widower in his midi-60's, who was diagnosed with  metatastasized colon cancer. He is a home health agency patient, and his primary  caregivers are his two daughters. Ralph is unaware of the severity of his  condition and wanted to know what his state of health and prognosis were. The  nurse evaded his questions initially, and his daughters did not want to tell him  that his cancer was terminal. The nurse's position was not to continue providing  care for Ralph, as she would be deceiving him by not telling him the truth.  When the nurse consulted with Ralph's physician, he agreed with the family's  decision, as he felt that they needed time to accept their mother's recent death  and Ralph's impending death. The doctor ordered the nurse not to oppose him and  not to disclose any further infomation to Ralph.    THE PRINCIPLE: TRUTH-TELLING & DECEPTION (Should be "FIDELITY")    In most cases, a rational person has a right to truthful information and  avoidance of deception, which will allow him to decide which course of treatment  to follow. A patient's right to decide includes the right to know the truth, not  be brainwashed, and not be lied to or deceived by having information withheld  that is relevant to his own health. There is a moral standard that condemns lies,  deception and withholding of relevant information. To tell Ralph that  "everything was all right and he would be up and around the house in no time at  all" is deceptive, as his condition is terminal, although he does not yet  realize it.    The ANA Standards of Clinical Nursing Practice states that clients should be  educated about ther illness, which is subsumed within Standards of Care (p3).  In Standard V-Ethics (p15), measurement criteria #3 states that "the nurse acts  as a client advocate" and #5 states the "nurse delivers care in a manner that  preserves and protects client autonomy, dignity and rights".    The "Patient's Bill of Rights" cites somes cases that justify overriding a  patient's autonomy rights, however. Considering that Ralph has recently lost  his wife and that he is still working through his own grief may present a  morally compelling reason for withholding information and considering Ralph's  best interests. His emotional status may need to be assessed to assure that he  would not be suicidal or lose interest in the remaining quality of his life,  also to determine his ability to cope, before telling him the truth, and  prevention of harm overrides autonomy rights.    If I were involved in Ralph's care as his nurse, I would have great difficulty    					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.